Warren Stringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>#--------------------------------------
>class do(list):
> def __call__(self,*args,**kwargs):
> return [f(*args,**kwargs) for f in self]
>
>
>def a(): print 'a called'
>def b(): print 'b called'
>c = do()
>c = [a,b]
>do(c[:])()
>do(c)()
>#--------------------------------------
>
>I prefer that last line, because [:] is very expensive to type from a cell
>phone.
And not because it's completely redundant?
>Now, if I could only could do this:
>
> do(orchestra(conductor)).play()
Something along the lines of:
def __getattr__(self, name):
return do(getattr(x, name) for x in self)
?
--
\S -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chaos.org.uk/~sion/
"Frankly I have no feelings towards penguins one way or the other"
-- Arthur C. Clarke
her nu becomeþ se bera eadward ofdun hlæddre heafdes bæce bump bump bump
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
