exhuma.twn skrev: >> for number in range(10,100): >> for divisor in range(2,number): >> if number % divisor == 0: >> break >> else: >> print number, >> > > Oh my. Would it not be an idea to rename this "else" into a "finally"? > As Gabriel points out, the else-block gets executed after the for loop > exits *normally*. In that case, is the "else" not semantically > misleading? I would surely misunderstand it if I saw it the first time.
"finally" would be at least equally confusing IMO, indicating that the code is always called (although this would of course make it a ridiculous construct). /Nis -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list