Paul Rubin wrote:
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Compare out-of-the-box Python:
  a = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4

And out-of-the-box Lisp:
  (setq a (+ 1 2 3 4))

Which language has the lower barrier for entry? That should be a
fairly important consideration for a language that is going to sit at
the heart of an OS.


Huh?  Why does mucking about in the heart of an OS need a low barrier
of entry?

It doesn't. I was looking at it from the point of view of *scripting* the OS - which *should* have a low barrier for entry :)


Cheers,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
            http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to