John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What we need are better implementations than CPython, not > hokey attribute schemes bolted onto the language. We're seeing > stuff go in that's easy to add to CPython, but not necessarily > good for the language as a whole.
I think it was a real loss that Python 3.0 proposals were closed before PyPy was widely deployed and we had a chance to get more experience with it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
