On Jun 25, 3:47 am, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 7:04 pm, Bruno Barberi Gnecco
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>         I've found a lot of XML libraries for Python. Any advices on which
> >> one to use (or *not* to use)? My requirements are: support for XPath,
> >> stability (a must, segfaults are not an option), with DOM API and good
> >> performance desirable.
>
> > I use the minidom module for most of my XML work, but I don't think it
> > has much in the way of XPath. I think lxml might work better for that
> > sort of thing and I think it's part of ElementTree:
>
> >http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev/objectify.html
>
> lxml is not part of ElementTree (only mostly compatible), but it's a must if
> you want to have a simple API *and* XPath *and* good performance.
>
> http://codespeak.net/lxml/
>
> The API is not W3C-DOM compatible, but that's rather a plus IMHO.
>
> Stefan

Oops, sorry about the mis-information. I mis-read 
http://effbot.org/zone/element-index.htm

Mike

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to