Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > Bjoern Schliessmann wrote: >> Paul Rubin wrote: >>> lex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> but what is your best way to test for for False in a list? >>> >>> status = all(list) >> >> Am I mistaken, or is this no identity test for False at all? > > You are mistaken. all take an iterable and returns if each value > of it is true. That's an identity test for True, not for False (the latter was requested). Thus, I'm not mistaken. Regards, Björn -- BOFH excuse #236: Fanout dropping voltage too much, try cutting some of those little traces -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
