Arno,
> Your patches solves the problem too. Thanks!
>
> One thing: if I use the unpatched xmlrpclib.py, the printed output of
> xml calls look like:
>
> {'state': 0, 'str': 'Info_RT'}
>
> But if I use your patch, they look like:
>
> state0strInfo_RT
>
> I prefer the former, as it is easier to extract the info. Why did this
> change with your patch?
I've no idea, I'll look into this as soon as possible. Thanks for
letting me know.
I want to point you to another possible solution, which is using a
derived
transport class. I've posted this on my blog, see
http://www.itkovian.net/base/transport-class-pythons-xml-rpc-lib
I'm not sure if this might solve the problem you pointed out.
-- Andy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
