> Alan Isaac skrev: >>http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0285/
Nis Jørgensen wrote: > You forgot to quote this bit: [4)] Actually not. That is a different point. Ben seems bothered by this, but not me. I do not mind that True+1 is 2. I won't do it, but I do not object to it being possible. I do not like that True+True is 2. I do not like that bool(False-True) is True. I do not like that True and False are assignable, which clearly begs for bugs to pass unseen. >>> True, False = False, True >>> print True, False False True Who can like that???? I also generally agree with Steve, whose points keep being twisted beyond recognition. Also, tah is right about my underlying interest in arrays of bools (and more specifically, boolean matrices). I think Python 3000 is the right time to reconsider the "ideal world" that Guido mentions in PEP 285. Cheers, Alan Isaac -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list