Steve Holden a écrit : > Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: >> Jean-Paul Calderone a écrit : >>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -0000, "Justin T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome. >>>> My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream python >>>> tree? Does it cause problems with the current C-extensions? It seems >>>> like if something is fully compatible and better, then it would be >>>> adopted. However, it hasn't been in what appears to be 7 years of >>>> existence, so I assume there's a reason. >>> It's not Pythonic. >> >> Hum... Yes ? Really ? Care to argument ? > > Unfortunately such arguments quickly descend to the "yes it is", "no it > isn't" level, as there is no objective measure of Pythonicity.
indeed !-) But that doesn't prevent from honestly trying to explain why one asserts such a thing - which Jean-Paul did in another post in this thread. > Twisted is a complex set of packages Sure. Now I may be dumb, but I thought it was about stackless, not about Twisted... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list