Steve, it wasn't me that raised the comparison with MFC. If you don't think that's a helpful comparison, why not reply to that post instead?
I don't mind Björn's suggestion that I don't know what I'm talking about, because I started it by telling him he was wrong. But you don't have that excuse. (david) Steve Holden wrote: > [david] wrote: >> Well yes, I have tried this app with native windows, >> and I know how to do it. >> >> But if all wxPython can offer is a poor imitation >> of MFC, I'm better off using MFC aren't I? >> >> And too all those people who wrote back to insist >> that users MUST explicitly build a multi-threaded >> framework for wxPython: >> >> It's supposed to already be a framework :~) >> > The answer is simple. If you don't see any advantage to using wxPython > then don't use it. Personally I believe wxPython is far from a poor > imitation of MFC, but if you are already familiar with MFC then go ahead > and use it. > > regards > Steve -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list