On Sep 12, 11:35 am, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:09:02 +0000 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 12, 5:17 am, Peter Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Your assessment is wrong. You only get the extra lines in the traceback if
> >> you don't immediately wrap the exec statement in a try ... except block:
> >> $ cat snip_traceback3.py
> >> import sys
> >> import traceback
>
> >> def alpha():
> >> beta()
>
> >> def beta():
> >> gamma()
>
> >> def gamma():
> >> try:
> >> exec s in {}
> >> except Exception, e:
> >> etype, value, tb = sys.exc_info()
> >> traceback.print_exception(etype, value, tb.tb_next)
>
> >> s = """
> >> def delta():
> >> epsilon()
>
> >> def epsilon():
> >> 1/0
> >> delta()
> >> """
>
> >> if __name__ == "__main__":
> >> alpha()
>
> >> $ python snip_traceback3.py
> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >> File "<string>", line 7, in <module>
> >> File "<string>", line 3, in delta
> >> File "<string>", line 6, in epsilon
> >> ZeroDivisionError: integer division or modulo by zero
>
> >> Heureka.
> > Thanks for the help, Peter. That's exactly what I need.
>
> Indeed. But not exactly what you want, it seems.
>
> > Now could I
> > use your tb.tb_next trick a couple times and thus avoid moving the try/
> > except?
>
> Of course you can cut off the traceback at arbitrary positions. Here's an
> example that uses the filename:
>
> import traceback
> import sys
>
> def tb_filename(tb):
> return tb.tb_frame.f_code.co_filename
>
> def tb_iter(tb):
> while tb is not None:
> yield tb
> tb = tb.tb_next
>
> def alpha():
> try:
> beta()
> except Exception, e:
> etype, value, tb = sys.exc_info()
> filename = tb_filename(tb)
> for tb in tb_iter(tb):
> if tb_filename(tb) != filename:
> break
> traceback.print_exception(etype, value, tb)
>
> def beta():
> gamma()
>
> def gamma():
> exec s in {}
>
> s = """
> def delta():
> epsilon()
>
> def epsilon():
> 1/0
> delta()
> """
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
> alpha()
>
> Did I mention it already? It's better to move the try ... except.
>
> Peter
This approach is ideal. Indirect, but ideal :-) I'll apply it
tonight.
It's complicated but suffice it to say it would be difficult to move
the try/except. Thanks for the help. Way to know about tracebacks,
very impressive!
-Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
