[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes: > In general, "a superclass of foo" means "a class X such that foo is a > sublass of X"
Sure. However, this doesn't equate to the assertion that "next class in the MRO is the superclass", which is what I was responding to. -- \ "Even if the voices in my head are not real, they have pretty | `\ good ideas." —anonymous | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
