Michele Simionato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sep 19, 1:16 pm, Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Your arguments against the superclass term seem to assume that there >> is only a single superclass to a particular class. > > If you say "the" superclass, then you also assume it is unique.
FWIW, Bruno said "a", at least in the section you quoted. > But the big issue is that the order of the methods depends on the > second argument to super, the instance, so there is no useful > concept of the superclass of the first argument of super. No argument here. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list