On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:47:37 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote: > On 22 Sep., 08:56, Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > If you feel you can transform it into another unambigous grammar >> > mixing statements and expressions it's up to you. >> >> We got rid of the print statement for python 3.0. Why not get rid >> of the rest of them too? Just use expressions for everything, as >> works fine for plenty of other languages. > > One might create a new dynamic functional+OO programming language, > where small statements like print, assert, raise etc. all become > functions and statements like while, for, with etc. become anonymous > closures.
Before someone starts to create such a thing he should take a look at Io which has just objects and methods. http://www.iolanguage.com/ Ciao, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
