Lawrence Oluyede wrote: > Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At least, you missed Turbo Gears :) >> http://turbogears.org/ >> For me, it feels more integrated than Pylons. > > Yeah, so integrated that the next version will be based upon Pylons ;-) ?
What is good, since a lot of good things from Pylons will work with TG and a lot of good TG things will remain (and possibly be compatible with Pylons). If you take a better look at "the next version", you'll also see that the major concern was with WSGI support and reinventing / "rewriting" the wheel (what TG developers don't want to do all the time). As an example of this fusion, take a look at ToscaWidgets. Works, *today*, with both frameworks. You don't have to wait for "the next version". -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
