If you sheeple are ignorant of what I say, look at this link: and the papers therein.
911blogger.com st911.org stj911.org (1) Why did FBI bastards not catch the ANTHRAX mailer? (2) Why did building 7 commit suicide? (3) Where is the Pentagon video, of the plane hitting it ? On Oct 8, 11:30 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This William D Clinger is a YANK MOTHER F*CKER, a 911 controlled > demolition operator group member or a ROGUE bastard in FBI whose > job and RACIST tendency is to CONTROL FREEDOM of information. > These MOTHERF*CKERS using fake accounts use "FULL LONG NAMES" > to FOOL simple and honest people that they are some genuine > people. They have multiple accounts and their sole job is to > derail conversations on the threads where there is exchange of > knowledge. That is their FULL TIME JOB. They use ebooks from > where they cut and paste to look they have multiple specialities > but this could be even 3 bastards working full time daily with > 150 nicks and accounts all automated. > > Please look at my articles on google. just click my profile on > groups.google.com to find out the potent truth I have written. > > I am sure you have seen that video of a student being tasered > in University of Florida because these bastards hate our freedoms. > > These are corporatist bastards whose whole goal is to keep the > public ignorant. THESE MOTHERFUCKERS hid the anthrax mailer who > was really one of them. THE FBI Bastards never caught the anthrax > mailer based in the USA> > > On Oct 8, 1:55 am, William D Clinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The gnuist wrote: > > > Many years ago I went to an MIT prof on a technique I had become aware > > > of. Its not McCarthy. When I asked him for his class notes on the > > > subject to self-study, first he stared at me as if I was some kind of > > > thief. Then as we were coming down to the first floor of the high > > > voltage lab, I asked him why didnt he publish it? He said, and these > > > are exact words: "you can make us as much guilty as you want, but we > > > did not publish it." > > > An MIT prof who is not fluent in English and is also not > > McCarthy? That narrows it down. > > > > You may want to be clear about SI and SC. > > > what language is source interpreter written in? > > > what language is source compiler written in? > > > It doesn't matter. > > > > I would actually prefer that there was no environment > > > available like no C compiler. > > > That doesn't matter either. > > > > All the processes would have to be created. > > > Plz note that I am neither a CS nor a logician. > > > Nor does that. > > > > I prefer detailed treatment of this subject that is actually useful. > > > It would be hard to improve upon the advice that Jens gave > > you. I will add this: If you don't have a compiler SC for > > the language in which SI is written, then you have to write > > SC before you hand-simulate it (or execute it, if you happen > > to have a compiler for the language in which SC is written). > > > I will also add this: If SC is written in the same language > > as SI, then hand-simulating SC on SC itself gives you an > > executable compiler, which you can then use to compile SI. > > > Been there, done that. > > > Will- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
