2007/10/21, Robert Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 10/21/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, I literally meant that the Python C API is object-oriented. > > You don't need an object-oriented language to write object-oriented > > code. > > I disagree with this statement. C is not an object oriented language, > and I've seen attempts to make it somewhat object oriented, however it > failed miserably in readability and manageability overhead.
just FYI. What about the linux kernel? It's (in large parts) perfectly designed by OO principles (the vfs for example). And I can't remember that it was written in C++. Make a struct with some funtion pointers in it and you are at a basic OO level. the pointers could then manipulate the variables in the struct (remember a C++ struct ist just a class with all things being public). How does that differ from python? - I can't remember having visibility modifiers in python.... (so that would lead to that python isn't object oriented as any programmer could at any time directly manipulate any method/variable/whatsoever of your classes) -- http://noneisyours.marcher.name http://feeds.feedburner.com/NoneIsYours -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
