jwelby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a fair question. I didn't phrase my post too well. > > I find PyScripter does pretty much everything I need in terms of doing > actual development for Python. My use of 'lightweight' is by no means > a criticism of PyScripter - it's more of a compliment, as it refers to > the relatively modest demands that it makes on my system compared with > Eclipse, which can be hog. > > The main reason I have used Eclipse for larger, team based, projects > is for the source control plug-ins. Eclipse has plug-in support for > cvs and svn. PyScripter may have this too - perhaps I've missed it. > (I'm away from my Windows box at the moment, otherwise I would check). > Of course, there are other ways to implement source control without it > needing to be integrated in the IDE, so even this need not put off > anyone who wants to use PyScripter with source control. > > Summary - unless you need the added flexibility offered by Eclipse > plug-ins, PyScripter is a great tool for developing with Python on > Windows. I'm not sure if you count emacs as "lightweight" but it's certainly less resource hungry than eclipse/pydev, and does have integrated cvs/svn functionality. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
