On Dec 12, 4:09 am, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Curiously, whenever property syntax is discussed the > discussion loses track and is dragged away by needless side > discussions. Just look at Stephen Bethards withdrawn PEP 359 [1] in > which he finally muses about replacing the class statement by the make > statement. So the PEP ended in "abstract nonsense" instead of > clarifying the point. > > [1]http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0359/
Ah, the 'make' statement.. I liked (and still do) that PEP, I think it would have an impact comparable to the decorator syntax sugar, if not more. Alas, it was too much ahead of its time.. who knows, it might revive on some 3.x version. George -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
