On Jan 4, 5:08 pm, Sion Arrowsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > But the real killer is that requirement for a std::set<T> is that > T::operator< exists. Which means, for instance, that you can't > have a set of complex numbers....
This is really OT but IIRC, std::set<T> is actually std::set< T, std::less<T> > So make your own less_complex() function (for example, use lexicographic order), std::set<complex, less_complex> should give you a set of complex numbers (sorry if some syntax is incorrect I haven't done any C++ for a while :) -- Arnaud -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
