aspineux a écrit : > Hi > > I read the PEP 3117 about the new "Postfix type declarations" in > Python3000. > THIS PEP as been REJECTED !
Indeed - it's an april's fool joke !-) And BTW, no need to scream, we hear you pretty well. > But ... > > The notation in the PEP is very ugly ! This make python code more > difficult to read! > > Anyway when I switched to python (from C, C++, ..), I suffered a lot > of the > untyped python variables. > And I think this is a good idea to include > typing in python. The concept of "type" greatly differs between static typing and dynamic typing. FWIW, it also somewhat differs between declarative static type systems (C/C++/Java/etc) and inference-based static type systems (OCaml, Haskell etc). Anyway, Python is dynamically typed (FWIW, it's dynamic almost everywhere), and this is probably not going to change in a foreseeable future. So I guess you'd better learn to use dynamic typing instead of trying to write C++ in Python - or, if you just can't get used to dynamic typing, use another language. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
