On Jan 16, 11:31 am, _wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 16, 3:11 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven a écrit : > > > > -On [20080116 12:51], Bruno Desthuilliers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >> Apart from checking posts headers and complaining about the relevant > > >> ISPs, there's not much you can do AFAIK. This is usenet, not a > > >> mailing-list. > > > > It is both actually. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is linked to comp.lang.python due > > > to a news gateway. > > > Yes, I know - but the OP explicitely mentionned c.l.py (re-read the > > title), not the ML. > > technically correct, but the idea is of course to keep all those > archives relatively clean and informative. the new fad i've observed > seems to be to initiate whole threads where previously spam very often > stopped short of any second post.
The ones that have received more than 2 responses have, the vast majority of the time, been cross posts. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
