On Jan 28, 1:05 am, ajaksu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 27, 10:32 pm, Paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would value the opinion of fellow Pythoneers who have also > > contributed to Wikipedia, on the issue of "Is Python Standardized". > > Specifically in the context of this table: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming_languages#Gene... > > (Comparison of programming languages) > > And this entry in the talk page > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Comparison_of_programming_languages... > > (Talk:Comparison of programming languages#Standardized Python?) > > > - Thanks. > > Hmmm. Seems to me that "Is X Standardized" in the given context means > having a formal, published standard issued by some Standards > organization. While you can discuss the meaning of some so-called > standards (like W3C's 'recommendations', RFCs, etc.), Python, IMHO, > doesn't fit the label. There is no "Standard" to reference that is > implementation, documentation and core-dev's opinion independent to a > reasonable degree. > > I guess MilesAgain gives the best arguments regarding this issue. > > Not-that-my-opinion-should-have-any-weight-ly y'rs > Daniel
Thanks Daniel. I am very close to the issue and would like to step back and c.l.p'ers opinion. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list