[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Zbigniew Braniecki: >> Is there a way to speed it up? Any easier way? Faster method? > > This problem is a bit messy. Maybe it's better to sidestep the > problem, and not use a list, and create an object that wraps the list, > so it always keeps an updated record of what changes are done... but > you have to notify it if you change the objects it contains.
That would be sweet... But I rarely will have it on the plate. In most cases I will load the two l10nObjects from the files and then I'll have to compare them in the way described above. So it's something like compare-locales or compare-l10n-directories script in the easiest form. and it'll be launched in the pessimistic case on around 40 locales each of them made of ~800 l10nObjects. I'll probably leave two methods. The faster for automated scripts which just have to catch changes and report that the file needs an update, and a detailed one for presenting it to the user. I was just thinking that there maybe exists a smart, fast, powerful method that would eliminate use of ndiff to compare two lists. Thanks for help! Greetings Zbigniew Braniecki -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
