On Feb 4, 10:11 am, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is nice.
Thanks. > * I wouldn't choose '&' as the composing operator as when I read > 'double & square' I think 'take an x, double it & square it' which is > the wrong interpretation (perhaps << instead?). A very good point that I didn't think about; I just blindly took the OP's chosen operator. Another thing I realized after writing this was that I could have also written a corresponding __rand__ method (__rlshift__ with your alternative operator), in case the object to the right of the operator is a composer object and to the left is a simple function. > * I would call the decorator 'composable'. The thing about that, though, is that this can also be used as a composition in function style. However, I can't think of any name that encompasses both uses. And you're right in that composer wasn't a very good choice of name. As I say, it was written in haste. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
