Steve Holden wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Why not a Python COMPILER? >> >> What about a Python JIT hardware chip, so the CPU doesn't have to >> translate. Although it seems to me that with today's dual and quad >> core processors that this might be a mute point because you could just >> use one of the cores. >> > What about a chip that reads your mind and does what you want it to?
+1! > I am sure that would be popular with all the frustrated computer users > there are in the world. I'll take two. (Chips, not frustrated users). -- "I sold the cow for these magic ICs," said Jack. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
