> Hmm. On inspection, pyro seems to be really heavy, what with its > requirement of a pyro-nameserver, and using TCP as the transport.
The nameserver is purely optional. Regarding the overhead of transport - well, I didn't check pyro on that, but corba is 10-100 times faster over the network than soap/xmlrpc. So while the local loopback _might_ be slower (I'm not even sure about that) than the unix socket, marshalling data as xml has its own cost overhead. -- Regards, Diez B. Roggisch -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list