Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:14:10 -0600, Reedick, Andrew wrote: > >>>> 'c' is also the speed of light. >>> 'c' is the speed of light _in_a_vacuum_. >> True. >> >> >>>> And since nothing can travel faster than light... >>> Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light _in_a_vacuum_. There >>> are situtaitons where things can (and regularly do) travel faster than >>> light: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation >> >> Nope. It propagates, not travels, faster than light. Go ask a >> physicist to explain it. It's odd... > > Propagate, travel, what's the difference? > Unfortunately, I didn't study any of this but I sure do remember the answer one drunk physic said to me in a bar when I ask him the question: "Does light travel or propagate?" He answered: "Depends on how you see light." He must have studied philosophy too :-) <cut rest> -- mph -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: Why not a Python compiler? Luis M. González
- RE: Why not a Python compiler? Reedick, Andrew
- Re: Why not a Python compiler? Carl Friedrich Bolz
- Re: Why not a Python compiler? Luis M. Gonzalez
- Re: Why not a Python compiler? Carl Friedrich Bolz
- Re: Why not a Python compiler? Grant Edwards
- RE: Why not a Python compiler? Reedick, Andrew
- Re: Why not a Python compiler? Steve Holden
- RE: Why not a Python compiler? Jorge Godoy
- OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a Python ... Steven D'Aprano
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why not a... Martin P. Hellwig
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why n... Thomas Dybdahl Ahle
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why n... Grant Edwards
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: ... Jeff Schwab
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: ... Erik Max Francis
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: Why n... Doug Morse
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: ... Gabriel Genellina
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: ... Grant Edwards
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was Re: ... greg
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was ... Steven D'Aprano
- Re: OT: Speed of light [was ... Erik Max Francis