On Feb 9, 4:37 pm, Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carl Banks wrote: > > On Feb 8, 10:09 pm, Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you expect your data to be pretty nearly sorted > >> already, but you just want to make sure (e.g. because a small number of > >> elements may have been inserted or removed since the last sort), > >> bubble-sort is a good choice. > > > But if you're at that stage you probably were doing something wrong in > > the first place. > > How do you figure?
"Probably." :) Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
