En Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:51:19 -0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I ran it in an interactive python shell, which might have made a
> difference.
>
> import timeit
> time1=timeit.Timer('s=len(li); s==1000', 'li=range(1000)')
> time2=timeit.Timer('len(li)==1000', 'li=range(1000)')
> store=min(time1.repeat(5))
> call=min(time2.repeat(5))
> store=min(min(time1.repeat(5)),store)
> call=min(min(time2.repeat(5)),call)
> store
> 0.25531911849975586
> call
> 0.25700902938842773
>
> The difference is small enough to be insignificant, but I am curious
> how it's possible and why it happened. It's more likely a reflection
> of how I timed it than anything else, isn't it?
Yes, I think it's an artifact of how you measured it. I've tried this:
import timeit
time1=timeit.Timer('s=len(li); s==1000', 'li=range(1000)')
r1 = time1.repeat(5)
print 'store', min(r1), r1
time2=timeit.Timer('len(li)==1000', 'li=range(1000)')
r2 = time2.repeat(5)
print 'call', min(r2), r2
and got the expected results:
store 0.336916842783 [0.33712636661922118, 0.34131209413486907,
0.33691684278309109, 0.33726828409755982, 0.34154312908484186]
call 0.296055783626 [0.29648125669603265, 0.29605578362613105, 0
.29716346630647195, 0.29883546651878934, 0.29798368228364236]
--
Gabriel Genellina
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
