Marco Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > >> I realise that double underscores make the language conceptually > >> cleaner in many ways (because fancy syntax and operator overloading > >> are just handled by methods), but they don't *look* nice. > > > > That's a good thing, in that it draws attention to the names. > > Well, double underscore is awful when you have to read code with the > wrong typeface, possibly printed.
The wrong typeface can make anything awful to read. This is unrelated to double-underscores. The solution, therefore, is also unrelated to double-underscores: choose an appropriate typeface. -- \ “Courage is not the absence of fear, but the decision that | `\ something else is more important than fear.” —Ambrose | _o__) Redmoon | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
