Mensanator wrote: > On Mar 3, 2:49 pm, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's just a bug--probably sympy is messing with the internals of the >> random number generator. It would be a simple fix. Instead of >> b****ing about it, file a bug report. > > I did. > >> Or better yet, submit a patch. > > I would if I knew what the problem was. Did you even try to figure it out? It took me all of 5 minutes to find the mistake. > I posted it here because someone recommended it. > I'm simply un-recommending it. It was a mistake, an easily remedied mistake, not a big unchangeable design decision. If you want to recommend against sympy as a package, there is a larger burden of proof that you have yet to meet. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
