On Mar 4, 2:44 am, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mensanator wrote: > > On Mar 3, 11:58 pm, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mensanator wrote: > >>> I'm not hard to please at all. > >> No, of course not, since logically you must think all software is useless. > > > Somehow, I expected better logic from people who call themselves > > programmers. > > So you agree with me.
Are you deliberately misconstruing what I write? > Lack of prefection = uselessness. _I_ never said that. What I said was a zero change in net functionality is "worthless". A negative change in net functionality is "less than worthless". Haven't negative numbers been well understood since the Middle Ages? Why is this concept so difficult to grasp? > Thanks for being honest, I wish I could say the same. > whether your realized you defeated your own disclaimer or not. Conclusion based on false premise. > > -- > Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] &&http://www.alcyone.com/max/ > San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis > I wonder if heaven got a ghetto > -- Tupac Shakur -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list