HallÃchen! "Serge Orlov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Torsten Bronger wrote: > >>> Interesting. I've never thought that. What parts strike you as >>> "patchwork"? >> >> Well, with a little bit of experience in the field of programming >> languages, you can see which elements had been added later (ie >> years after Python's creation). Properties surely would have >> looked *very* different 15 years ago. >> >> There would be keywords for static and class methods, no >> distinction between Unicode and non-Unicode > > You couldn't do that 15 years ago because there were no Unicode > that time. I've never said that Guido was just too stupid at that time. I only said "but you can definitely see that it's the oldest one". In other words, a Ruby six years older than the real one would have the same problem. And who knows how C# looks like in 10 years. But I want to program now, and this is the current situation in my opinion. TschÃ, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
