Paul Rubin wrote: > The cmp option should not be removed. However, requiring
> it to be specified as a keyword parameter instead of just > passed as an unlabelled arg is fine. Sure; I would have no problem with that. But that is not what is happening. As for Carl's suggestion to use ``key``: this is already possible when it is convenient, but it is not always convenient. (Even aside from memory considerations.) By the way, I even saw mention of even removing the ``cmp`` built-in. Cheers, Alan Isaac -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
