> > Well, lets say you have a situation where you're going to be > > alternating between sending large and small chunks of data. Is the > > solution to create a NetworkBuffer class and only call send when the > > buffer is full, always recv(8192)? > > Or create a protocol where the first 16 bits (in network byte order) > contain a length value for the subsequent data, and use a receive > process that consists of: > > leng = ntoh(socket.recv(2)) > data = socket.receive(leng) > > (the send can combine the length with the data into a single packet)
Are two 'sends' guaranteed to arrive as at least two 'receives'? Send-3: xxx Send-3: yyy Receive-6: xxxyyy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
