sturlamolden wrote: > On 16 Mar, 15:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> It seems the development of Cython is going very well, quite >> differently from the dead-looking Pyrex. Hopefully Cython will become >> more user-friendly too (Pyrex is far from being user-friendly for >> Windows users, it doesn't even contain a compiler, I think. The > > Pyrex is not dead.
Technically, that's true. There has been a release not so long ago, although after a rather lengthy idle period. However, the current development cycle of Cython is so fast that Pyrex will have a hard time catching up. So there isn't much of a reason why you should prefer Pyrex over Cython. Stefan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
