Grant Edwards wrote:
That seems to imply that you think market sucess == technicalAs Prothon never got as far as an alpha stage product, I don't think you could call it a technical success. It may well not have been a technical failure, as it didn't get far enough to become one, but it certainly was NOT a technical success.
merits. Unless you mean that Prothon was a technical failure
rather than a market-share failure...
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
