On Mar 23, 8:24 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NotGuru schrieb: > > > My questions is: is it necessary to check the null pointer in the > > macro or it's a job for the user? Semantically all the type check > > should report a false if a null pointer is encountered. I've already > > had the patch to this issue but I am not sure if I think this problem > > right. I don't know if there are some python core developers around > > but I would like to hear all opinions towards this. > > Unless stated otherwise no Py* or PY* function is NULL safe. You have to > check for NULL unless the docs *explicitly* say it's safe to call it > with a NULL argument. > > Christian
Thank you Christian and John, I skipped Section 1.3 of that document, so shameful. ;) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list