On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:59:33 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Diez B. Roggisch: >> the author says that the approach is flawed, so at *some* >> point it will be discontinued. > >Can't Psyco be improved, so it can compile things like: > >nums = (i for i in xrange(200000) if i % 2) >print sum(nums) >
Sure, it can be. That doesn't mean it will be. Someone has to do it. :) One reason attention is going to PyPy instead of Psyco is that PyPy's JIT doesn't require as much careful attention to support and maintain support for features like generators. Jean-Paul -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
