"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here the problem is more philosophical than anything else. Python's > philosophy is that most programmers are responsible and normally > intelligent, so treating them all like retarted dummies because > someone might one day do something stupid is just wasting everyone's > time. This is also why there's no language-enforced access > restriction, only a simple stupid convention to denote implementation > stuff from API. The fact is that it JustWork.
Additional Principles for C1X (new) ... 12. Trust the programmer, as a goal, is outdated in respect to the security and safety programming communities. While it should not be totally disregarded as a facet of the spirit of C, the C1X version of the C Standard should take into account that programmers need the ability to check their work. C - The C1X Charter Document: WG14 N1250, p. 3 http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1250.pdf -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list