On Apr 9, 11:53 am, John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jmDesktop wrote: > > If I continue in Python 2.5.x, am I making a mistake? Is it really > > that different? > > No. It may never happen, either. The Perl crowd tried > something like this, Perl 6, which was announced in 2000 and still > hasn't come out. The C++ standards committee has been working on a > revision of C++ since the 1990s, and that hasn't happened either.
You're not paying attention if you think there's it's still doubt over whether Python 3 will happen. > The general consensus is that Python 3.x isn't much of an > improvement over the existing language. I'm going to have to opine that you pulled this out of your ass. > There's just not much demand for it. Well that's a little mode defensible seeing that we really don't know how people will react. Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
