En Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:14:31 -0300, Jason Scheirer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Apr 12, 2:44 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Victor Subervi wrote:
>> > Well, as I mentioned before, I am sending text/html because the page, >> > like almost all web pages, has a whole lot more content than just >> > images. Or, perhaps you are suggesting I build my pages in frames, and >> > have a frame for every image. Unsightly! >> >> Dear Victor: >> >> If you cannot understand, after being told several times by different >> people, that pages with images in them are achieved by multiple HTTP >> requests, then there is little I can do to help you. >> [...] >> Please, do yourself a big favor and persist with this until you >> understand what you are doing wrong and how to serve dynamic images. It >> appears that the learning may be painful, but I guarantee it will be >> worthwhile. > > There _is_ a way to embed image data in HTML that is supported by > every major browser. It is ugly. Using the RFC 2397 (http:// > www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2397) spec for data URLs you could go > > '<img src="data:image/jpg;base64,%s">' % base64.b64encode(image_data) Another alternative would be to generate a multipart/related document, but I think the OP will gain a lot more understanding the simple cases than using those esoteric features. -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list