Lie schrieb:
> On Apr 13, 7:23 pm, Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In article
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>
>> Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I wish py3k
>>> would make it an option whether to treat print as statement or
>>> function though.
>> Arrrgghhhhh! No, don't even go there. If you want optional parens, use
>> Perl :-)
>
> Not optional parens, but a simple print statement coupled with a
> powerful print function. This print statement would only have basic
> printing functionality such as :
>
> print "Hello"
> print var
> print var, "Hello too"
>
> specifically, these would be removed:
> print var,
> print >> unstdout, var
>
> This is because it is sometimes annoying to type this:
> print("Hello")
> print("World")
> print("This")
> print("is")
> print("Captain")
> print("Kirk")
You are aware that it is only one character more to type?
It is debatable if print should have gone or not - but once you decide
to have a print-statement I fail to see why you want to rid it of
functionality. The costs for a keyword and special parsing rules are
paid anyway then.
Diez
Diez
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
