[El Pitonero] > Is it even necessary to use a method name? > > import copy > class safedict(dict): > def __init__(self, default=None): > self.default = default > def __getitem__(self, key): > try: > return dict.__getitem__(self, key) > except KeyError: > return copy.copy(self.default) > > > x = safedict(0) > x[3] += 1 > y = safedict([]) > y[5] += range(3) > print x, y > print x[123], y[234]
safedict() and variants have been previously proposed with the name defaultdict or some such. For the most part, adding methods is much less disruptive than introducing a new type. As written out above, the += syntax works fine but does not work with append(). As written, the copy.copy() approach is dog slow but can be optimized for lists and ints while retaining its type flexibility. BTW, there is no need to make the same post three times. Raymond -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
