Yves Dorfsman a écrit :
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch wrote:
y, _, d, _, _, _, _, _, _ = time.localtime()
But you still have have a variable that's using memory for nothing.
I'm afraid you just don't understand what Python's "variable" are.
You're really worrying about a non-issue here. Seriously.
I
find this unsatisfactory...
Get over it…
Than what's the point of wanting a better language if every time we run
in something that looks wrong, or something that could be done better we
should just "get over it" ?
No language can be everything to everyone and still retain any kind of
consistency. And the Python's team really try to keep a good balance
between features and consistency (and so far mostly succeed IHMO).
Now, of course, suggesting features or potential improvements *is* a
good idea (and FWIW there's an official way to do so : PEPs). But this
doesn't mean that each an any such proposition is a good idea by itself,
nor that it makes any sense wrt/ Python's design, nor that it's worth
implementing it.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
