On May 16, 4:51 pm, Hans Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 16 mai, 23:34, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 16 mai, 23:28, Hans Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Dan Upton wrote:
> >>>> for pid in procs_dict:
> > (snip)
> >>> for pid in procs_dict.keys():
> >> I'm afraid this will do the same exact thing. A for loop on a dict
> >> iterates over the dict keys, so both statements are strictly
> >> equivalent from a practical POV.
>
> > Hem. Forget it. I should think twice before posting - this will
> > obviously make a big difference here. Sorry for the noise.
>
> :-) It appears that you would be right if this was Python 3.0, though:
>
> Python 3.0a5 (r30a5:62856, May 16 2008, 11:43:33)
> [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)] on darwin
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >>> d = {1: 2, 3: 4, 5: 6}
> >>> for i in d.keys(): del d[i]
> ...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration
>
> Maybe 'for i in d' and 'for i in d.keys()' *are* functionally equivalent in
> 3.0,
> as d.keys() returns an object that iterates over d's keys... but I haven't
> read
> enough about it yet to be sure. In any case, the problem goes away when we
> force a list:
>
> >>> d = {1: 2, 3: 4, 5: 6}
> >>> for i in list(d.keys()): del d[i]
> ...
> >>> d
> {}
>
> --Hans- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You may be searching for:
for i in d.keys()[:]:
del d[ i ]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
