On May 19, 6:52 am, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henrique Dante de Almeida a écrit : > > > On May 17, 7:32 pm, Vicent Giner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello. > > (snip) > >> However, it is usually said that Python is not a compiled but > >> interpreted programming language —I mean, it is not like C, in that > >> sense. > > (snip) > > I guess that python is not a good language for that. > (snip) > > My opinion: choose compiled or byte compiled languages. > > Slightly OT (ie : not talking about computation-heavy alorgithm being > better implemented in C then wrapped in Python - this seems quite > obvious) but just a couple facts: > > 1/ being interpreted or compiled (for whatever definition of these > terms) is not a property of a language, but a property of an > implementation of a language. > > 2/ actually, all known Python implementations compile to byte-code.
Yes, I was actually referring to statically typed JIT-compiled languages. Sorry about that, blame the beers that entered my digestive system that night. :-P -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
