On Thu, 22 May 2008 19:35:50 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote: > Although when comparing Candygram with Erlang it's worth noting that > Candygram is bound to one processor, where Erlang can operate on > multiple processors. (I'd been planning on using Candygram for a project > at one point, but this made it unusable.)
Really? The FAQ says it uses operating system threads, which I would have thought would mean it runs on multiple processors (modulo, I suppose, the issues with the GIL). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
