One great open source GUI package that you left out is GTK ie. pygtk. i cant compare it with wx as i have never used it but isay its much better than QT.
Anyway for ur q if u want to compair qt n wx. QT should be faster coz it has a better documentation. and welcome to the python family! kind regards binaryjesus On Jul 31, 12:10 pm, Tim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LessPaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >...My > >question is in regard to GUI platforms. My primary target would be > >Windows, but I would also like be able to support Linux and Mac > >versions if possible. I'm also interested in using a system that also > >has support for pure C++ applications. As such, and after reading many > >web pages regarding Python GUIs, I believe I have the candidates > >narrowed down to pyQT and wxPython. > > >The first question -- how steep is the curve to become proficient with > >the above GUI packages? > > There is so much personal preference here that it is extremely hard to give > any guidance. If you have done any Windows programming at all, so that you > are familiar with the event-driven programming model, then I don't think > you would see that much difference in learning curve. The two packages are > more alike than they are different -- the various APIs are just spelled > differently. > > I happen to be a big wxPython fan. I learn best by example, and wxPython > has a 44,000-line demo suite with 167 source files that demonstrates > virtually every class it includes. > > >Since there appears to be no commercial licencing fee for wxWidgets/ > >wxPython, the last question is what do I gain from going QT over wx? > >I've seen great applications written with both (on my computer I have > >the wxPython Digsby and the pyQT apps "Mnemosyne" and "Anki". All seem > >to be solid. > > Yep. Personal preference. > -- > Tim Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
